Feature #1856
RCP: 0.7.8, CA, CAH, Specificities, Lexical Table parent element in the corpora view
| Statut: | New | Début: | 13/09/2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priorité: | Normal | Echéance: | |||
| Assigné à: | - | % réalisé: | 70% |
||
| Catégorie: | Commands | Temps passé: | - | ||
| Version cible: | TXM 0.8.4 |
Description
Currently the results of CA, CAH, Specificities, Lexical Table parent are the not real ones.
The Specificities parent is a lexical table
The CA parent is a lexical table
The CAH parent is a CA (with current factomineR usage)
The Lexical Table parent is a partition Or an Index computed with a partition
This will ease the link of results for instance between a CA and a specificities computd with the same lexical table
Historique
#1 Mis à jour par Serge Heiden il y a environ 9 ans
Technically speaking and from a usage point of view, a CAH is not a descendant of a CA (in the FactomineR case, the CA is a helper to calculate the CAH) -> the CAH et CA should both be sibling descendants of a lexical table.
#2 Mis à jour par Benedicte Pincemin il y a presque 9 ans
Serge Heiden a écrit :
Technically speaking and from a usage point of view, a CAH is not a descendant of a CA (in the FactomineR case, the CA is a helper to calculate the CAH) -> the CAH et CA should both be sibling descendants of a lexical table.
As far as I know, with the FactomineR process we use, The CAH is computed on the coordinates of the points in a sub-space of the factorial space (the 5 first dimensions by default, or less if necessary). So CAH directly uses a result of CA : with the current implementation, CAH is a child of CA (even if in the general case, CAH could actually be computed on the lexical table and then be a brother of CA).
#3 Mis à jour par Matthieu Decorde il y a presque 9 ans
- % réalisé changé de 50 à 80
#4 Mis à jour par Sebastien Jacquot il y a plus d'un an
- Version cible changé de TXM 0.7.8 à TXM 0.8.4
- % réalisé changé de 80 à 70