Feature #1856
RCP: 0.7.8, CA, CAH, Specificities, Lexical Table parent element in the corpora view
| Status: | New | Start date: | 09/13/2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | |||
| Assignee: | - | % Done: | 80% |
||
| Category: | Commands | Spent time: | - | ||
| Target version: | TXM 0.7.8 |
Description
Currently the results of CA, CAH, Specificities, Lexical Table parent are the not real ones.
The Specificities parent is a lexical table
The CA parent is a lexical table
The CAH parent is a CA (with current factomineR usage)
The Lexical Table parent is a partition Or an Index computed with a partition
This will ease the link of results for instance between a CA and a specificities computd with the same lexical table
History
#1 Updated by Serge Heiden over 6 years ago
Technically speaking and from a usage point of view, a CAH is not a descendant of a CA (in the FactomineR case, the CA is a helper to calculate the CAH) -> the CAH et CA should both be sibling descendants of a lexical table.
#2 Updated by Benedicte Pincemin over 6 years ago
Serge Heiden a écrit :
Technically speaking and from a usage point of view, a CAH is not a descendant of a CA (in the FactomineR case, the CA is a helper to calculate the CAH) -> the CAH et CA should both be sibling descendants of a lexical table.
As far as I know, with the FactomineR process we use, The CAH is computed on the coordinates of the points in a sub-space of the factorial space (the 5 first dimensions by default, or less if necessary). So CAH directly uses a result of CA : with the current implementation, CAH is a child of CA (even if in the general case, CAH could actually be computed on the lexical table and then be a brother of CA).
#3 Updated by Matthieu Decorde over 6 years ago
- % Done changed from 50 to 80