Révision 69
pobysoPythonSage/src/sageSLZ/sageRationalOperations.sage (revision 69) | ||
---|---|---|
1 |
def lcmm(rationalList = None): |
|
2 |
""" |
|
3 |
Compute the lcm of an sequence (list, tuple) of numbers |
|
4 |
""" |
|
5 |
# No argument. |
|
6 |
if rationalList is None: |
|
7 |
raise TypeError('lcmm takes a list of rationals') |
|
8 |
# Try the len function. |
|
9 |
try: |
|
10 |
listLength = len(rationalList) |
|
11 |
except Exception: |
|
12 |
print "lcmm:", rationalList, "does not understand the len() function." |
|
13 |
return(0) |
|
14 |
# An empty list: return 0 |
|
15 |
if listLength == 0: |
|
16 |
return(0) |
|
17 |
# Only one element, return it, wahtever it is. |
|
18 |
if listLength == 1: |
|
19 |
return(rationalList[0]) |
|
20 |
try: |
|
21 |
return(reduce(lcm, rationalList)) |
|
22 |
except Exception: |
|
23 |
print "Exception raised in lcmm!" |
|
24 |
return(0) |
|
25 |
|
|
26 |
def denominators(rationalList = None): |
|
27 |
""" |
|
28 |
Compute the list of the denominators of a rational numbers list. |
|
29 |
""" |
|
30 |
# No argument. |
|
31 |
if rationalList is None: |
|
32 |
raise TypeError('numerators takes a list of rationals.') |
|
33 |
try: |
|
34 |
listLength = len(rationalList) |
|
35 |
except Exception: |
|
36 |
print "denominators:", rationalList, \ |
|
37 |
"does not understand the len() function." |
|
38 |
return([]) |
|
39 |
if listLength == 0: |
|
40 |
return([]) |
|
41 |
if listLength == 1: |
|
42 |
try: |
|
43 |
return(QQ(rationalList[0]).denominator()) |
|
44 |
except Exception: |
|
45 |
print "denominators:", rationalList[0], \ |
|
46 |
"has no \"denominator()\" member." |
|
47 |
return([]) |
|
48 |
denominatorsList = [] |
|
49 |
for i in xrange(listLength): |
|
50 |
try: |
|
51 |
denominatorsList.append(QQ(rationalList[i]).denominator()) |
|
52 |
except Exception: |
|
53 |
print "denominators:", rationalList[i], \ |
|
54 |
"has no \"denominator()\" member." |
|
55 |
return([]) |
|
56 |
return(denominatorsList) |
|
57 |
|
|
58 |
def numerators(rationalList = None): |
|
59 |
""" |
|
60 |
Compute the list of the numerators of a rational numbers list. |
|
61 |
""" |
|
62 |
# No argument. |
|
63 |
if rationalList is None: |
|
64 |
raise TypeError('numerators takes a list of rationals.') |
|
65 |
try: |
|
66 |
listLength = len(rationalList) |
|
67 |
except Exception: |
|
68 |
print "numerators:", rationalList, \ |
|
69 |
"does not understand the len() function." |
|
70 |
return([]) |
|
71 |
if listLength == 0: |
|
72 |
return([]) |
|
73 |
if listLength == 1: |
|
74 |
try: |
|
75 |
return(QQ(rationalList[0]).numerator()) |
|
76 |
except Exception: |
|
77 |
print "denominators:", rationalList[0], \ |
|
78 |
"has no \"numerator()\" member." |
|
79 |
return([]) |
|
80 |
numeratorsList = [] |
|
81 |
for i in xrange(listLength): |
|
82 |
try: |
|
83 |
numeratorsList.append(QQ(rationalList[i]).numerator()) |
|
84 |
except Exception: |
|
85 |
print "numerators:", rationalList[i], \ |
|
86 |
"has no \"numerator()\" member." |
|
87 |
return([]) |
|
88 |
return(numeratorsList) |
pobysoPythonSage/src/sageSLZ/sageSLZ-Notes.html (revision 69) | ||
---|---|---|
321 | 321 |
<p>The naive approach is to:</p> |
322 | 322 |
<ol> |
323 | 323 |
<li>give it a try with the initial data;</li> |
324 |
<li>you get a too large error, reduce (e. g. divide by 2) the interval by |
|
325 |
lowering the upper bound until the computed error matches the expected
|
|
324 |
<li>when you get a too large error, reduce (e. g. divide by 2) the interval by
|
|
325 |
lowering the upper bound until the computed error matches the target
|
|
326 | 326 |
error;</li> |
327 |
<li>use this upper bound as the lower bound of the next interval, always
|
|
327 |
<li>this upper bound becomes the lower bound of the next interval, always
|
|
328 | 328 |
using the orginal upper bound and repeat the process until you can cover |
329 | 329 |
the all initial interval with the computed sub-interval.</li> |
330 | 330 |
</ol> |
331 | 331 |
|
332 | 332 |
<p>In step 2 you may have to compute several polynomials until the computed |
333 | 333 |
error is below or equal to the expected error. You must not decrease the |
334 |
interval width too agressively since it multiplies the number of interval (and |
|
335 |
lengtens the subsequent manipulations that are made on each sub-interval).</p> |
|
334 |
interval width too agressively. There is no point in getting a too small approximation error since it multiplies the number of interval (and
|
|
335 |
lengthens the subsequent manipulations that are made on each sub-interval).</p>
|
|
336 | 336 |
|
337 |
<p>In step 3 you probably unutily compute polynomials for too large interval
|
|
337 |
<p>In step 3 you probably inutily compute polynomials for too large intervals
|
|
338 | 338 |
and you could know it from the previous computations.</p> |
339 | 339 |
|
340 |
<p>The whole idea is to reduce the number of polynomila computation and get the
|
|
341 |
maximum width (compatibile with the expected approwimaiton error).</p>
|
|
340 |
<p>The whole idea is to reduce the number of polynomial computations and get the
|
|
341 |
maximum width (compatible with the expected approwimaiton error).</p> |
|
342 | 342 |
|
343 | 343 |
<p>This process has different aspects:</p> |
344 | 344 |
<ol> |
... | ... | |
352 | 352 |
|
353 | 353 |
<p>For point 2, can some type of data structure keep the informations (which |
354 | 354 |
ones ?) and allow for an efficient reuse.</p> |
355 |
|
|
356 |
<p>Adjacent question: is it possible, given a the result of a previous |
|
357 |
computation, to forecast the effect on the approximation precision of a degree |
|
358 |
in(de)crease?</p> |
|
355 | 359 |
</body> |
356 | 360 |
</html> |
Formats disponibles : Unified diff