Révision 226 CSL17/appendix-completeness.tex
appendix-completeness.tex (revision 226) | ||
---|---|---|
5 | 5 |
|
6 | 6 |
The property is easily verified for the class of initial functions of $\mubci{i-1}$: constant, projections, (binary) successors, predecessor, conditional, as already shown in Sect. \ref{sect:graphsbasicfunctions}. Now let us examine the three constructions: predicative minimisation, predicative (safe) recursion and composition. |
7 | 7 |
\paragraph*{Predicative minimisation} |
8 |
Suppose $f(\vec u ; \vec x)$ is defined as $\mu x^{+1} . g(\vec u ; \vec x , x) =_2 0$.
|
|
8 |
Suppose $f(\vec u ; \vec x)$ is defined by predicative minimisation from $g$ (we then denote $f$ as as $\mu x^{+1} . g(\vec u ; \vec x , x) =_2 0$).
|
|
9 | 9 |
By definition $g$ is in $\mubci{i-2}$, and so by the inductive hypothesis there is a $\Sigma^{\safe}_{i-1}$ formula $A_g (\vec u , \vec x , x , y)$ computing the graph of $g$ such that, |
10 | 10 |
\[ |
11 | 11 |
\arith^i \proves \forall \vec u^\normal . \forall \vec x^\safe , x^\safe . \exists ! y^\safe . A_g(\vec u , \vec x , x , y) |
Formats disponibles : Unified diff