Feature #1533

Updated by Matthieu Decorde 8 months ago

When a CQL contains an '@@@' marker, like in for example "'je' @@@[pos='V.*']", the result match list contains three columns named CQI_CONST_FIELD_MATCH (start), CQI_CONST_FIELD_MATCHEND (end) and CQI_CONST_FIELD_TARGET (target: corresponding to the position of the match marked by '@@@' in the query, that is the verbs in the sample query).

See a complete example usage in Groovy in the "CQi tutorial":https://groupes.renater.fr/wiki/txm-info/tutoriel_cqi?s[]=cqi#executer_une_requete_cql_sur_le_corpus_discours_et_utiliser_les_resultats.

The Index, Concordance commands must use the target position in their arguments if it is present in the queries.

A command can test if an '@@@' target was expressed in the query by using the following test code on the results list: @CQI_CQP_SUBCORPUS_HAS_FIELD("DISCOURS:RES1", CQI_CONST_FIELD_TARGET)@.

In some cases the @ target is not resolved (exemple : "je" @[] [frpos=[V.+"]).

* Concordance
* Concordance: optionally,
** a) must fill the pivot column only with the position marked by the @@@ target
** OR b) wrap with "[" and "]" characters the position marked by the @@@ target in the pivot column text value see #1532
** OR c) highlight the position marked by the @@@ target in the pivot column (for example in bold). In that case the BackToText action could also highlight differently the position marked by the @@@ target in the edition
** if the target is not resolved, no highlight or wrapping is done

h3. Solution

Allow the user to choose the command behavior between :
* focus
* highlight

-----------> how , when ?

Currently the Index&Cooccurrences are focusing and the Concordance is highlighting. The referencer and Progression are not using it.

Back